In 2007 Geist Reservoir was off limits to swimmers, etc, as toxic algae bloomed in the water. In 2008 we have no idea if this will happen again, but at a meeting on April 29th a number of government officials came to tell the residents what they are going to go. As a former government engineer I saw the handwriting on the wall right away. When you don’t know what to do, or what you should do will cause too much controversy – study the problem and hope people will go away nodding their heads. Well they are going to study and study the reservoir this summer and all the water sources in the Upper Fall Creek Watershed. Wow, 73 testing stations and they made a big deal about placing one buoy in the water near the dam. I am surprised they didn’t try and get a grant to buy six buoys and place them all over the 1800 acres of the reservoir. That would be more in line with government/university thinking.
What was also interesting was that two state senators and one representative attended the meeting. All of their districts touch the reservoir, also were people from several state agencies, the water company, other cities that use the water and even people from the governor’s office. But of course missing were the Town of Fishers, who annexed the reservoir last year and Representative Kathy Richardson. I can understand the Town of Fishers, you see they only would show up if they could make money form the reservoir, if they could figure out a tax or fee to correct they would be at the meeting. Just watch if they annex the home around the reservoir they will institute a water clean-up fee, blaming the use of fertilizer from the homeowners and do nothing. Also missing was Kathy, who it appears does not go to meetings, and I am running against her in the fall election. Now I was at the meeting. Part of Geist is in Kathy’s district. But Kathy a long time ago forgot what represent the people means.
What am I going to do? The message was loud and clear one of the factors that can cause the growth of the algae is fertilizer with phosphorus in it. So my lawn has non-phosphors fertilizer being applied this summer and from now on. I have also installed a water aeration pump by my dock to add air into the water that helps with water quality.
If elected I will do something no one at the meeting was willing to stand up and do. I would submit legislation to ban the use of phosphors fertilizer anywhere in a watershed in Indiana or for sale in stores for use on properties less than five acres. This would still allow the use by farmers, but would remove the use by all homeowners and by the commercial lawn care companies.
My name is Joe Weingarten and I approve this message.
Weingarten for 29th District State Representative













Please get facts straight-Fishers did not annex Geist Reservoir only a small portion of the pond bottom.
If almost all of the bottom from 96 street up is small, you need a better map. They did not annex next to the property owners along all the shoreline so they would not have to notify the owners and they left out some of the coves for the same reason. I would suggest you look at the Fishers Town maps and see the vast amounts they did annex. I have the facts straight, you have the usual Fishers spin on the facts. In addition when you say the bottom it is like saying Fishers only annexed the land under your house. They annexed the vast majority of the reservoir and saying the water company owns it is the same as saying a land owner owns their house.
So Resident – you are the one who needs to check the facts.
I know who will not be elected! And that is a fact!
Dear Resident
Please go to
http://www.fishers.in.us/egov/docs/1132585647_775970.pdf and look at this example of the annexation area. The part of the reservoir in gray belongs to Fishers, the part in yellow they want to annex. You will notice the gray area is very large and proves my point. If you want I would be happy to show you all the different maps of the water area and you will see that I am correct.